What Shall I Call Thee?

20170824ma_4747
Growing up, one of my best friends would often refer to our favourite authors by their first names. (In fact, she still does it today.) And, by extension, any book by said author. So an L.M. Montgomery book would become a “Lucy Maud” … As in “Have you read this Lucy Maud?” (Later she’d shortened it to simply “Lucy”.)

And I’ve noticed that this with other people as well, typically regarding women writers. Louisa May Alcott and Laura Ingalls Wilder are “Louisa” and “Laura”. Jane Austen fans even have their own special designation as “Janeites”.

But why do we call authors by their first name? Is it because it makes these authors feel more like our friends? Well, that’s my guess.

But, I’m different. For me, it’s important to use the author’s name under which they published. So “Lucy Maud Montgomery” is written or spoken of as “L.M. Montgomery”. And thereafter, in the same conversation or article, just as “Montgomery”.  (Which becomes a slight problem if we’re talking about the Brontes!)

I think this may stem from this realization… Authors are people that have private lives. For example, “Lucy Maud” was never really called “Lucy” (her grandmother’s name) in her lifetime. Her family and friends called her “Maud”. And for most of her published life, she was “Mrs. Macdonald”. And yet, she published under the name “L.M. Montgomery”.

For me, that knowledge is enough. “L.M. Montgomery” she would be.

So, while C.S. Lewis was “Jack” to his friends, he was “C.S. Lewis” to me because that’s how I knew him.

And then there’s Jane Austen. I’m definitely a fan, but for some reason, I cannot (and will not) call myself a “Janeite”. I will not call her “Jane”.

I think, for me, it’s a respect thing. Respecting the work of the author. Respecting the boundaries between an author and the reader. Although, when my friend does the opposite? I find it endearing. It’s like Jane Austen really is her friend!

So, what’s that say about me? Hmm…

P.S. I don’t think there’s really a right or wrong side to this. But it interests me to find out where other people stand. What do you tend to do?

P.S. 2 – If you’re curious to know… The photo above is of a statue of “Lucy Maud” at the L.M. Montgomery Museum in Leaskdale, Ontario.

9 thoughts on “What Shall I Call Thee?

  1. I think for me, it depends on the author, but for the most part I use their full name so people know who I’m talking about. In L.M. Montgomery’s case, I have called her many things, out loud and in my blog posts, partly because I’ve “known” her for so long, but also because I don’t like typing out L.M. Montgomery! When I’m typing, I often just go with LMM.

    Thank you for sharing that picture of LMM’s statue! I’ve never seen it. Have you been to the museum?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I didn’t really know people have a tendency to call authors by their first names! (Excepting Jane Austen, of course. Her popularity has really skyrocketed!) To me, it just makes sense to call them by their last names because that’s how I’d refer to them in a literary analysis. I’m not sure my friends would know who I meant if I just used someone’s first name!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I was just thinking this the other day about one of the world’s favorite fictional characters: Elizabeth Bennet. She is called Lizzie by her sisters, and I often hear her referred to as that by many adoring fans like they were BFFs. But I never could get used to calling her that myself. It doesn’t feel right for some reason, but I don’t know why…

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s